Procurement teams
Match RFPs to qualified vendors
Bring qualification requirements, scope, geography, and capacity into one reviewable vendor shortlist.
Built for comparison-heavy teams
Turn crowded candidate pools, vendor lists, and project requirements into explainable shortlists your team can confidently act on.
Trial requests are reviewed with your workflow—no account or trial is created from this page.
Interactive match review
Use the walkthrough below to enter a requirement, parse a local sample, inspect weighted score reasoning, compare candidates, and see exactly what a buyer must verify.
01
Requirement
Trade, timing, scope
02
Evidence
Sources and weighted signals
03
Decision
Human verification
One system, many queues
SubConMatch gives your team a common decision surface: what fits, why it fits, and what still needs human verification.
Procurement teams
Bring qualification requirements, scope, geography, and capacity into one reviewable vendor shortlist.
Recruiting firms
Rank talent against the work that needs doing, then show the evidence behind every recommendation.
Commercial general contractors
Compare certifications, trade experience, service area, project size, and availability before outreach.
Government contractors
Surface suppliers for purchasing requirements and business opportunities that fit verified capabilities.
Interactive walkthrough
Walk through a commercial GC's response after the incumbent electrician falls behind on an occupied tenant-improvement project.
Illustrative scenario only
People, subcontractor names, messages, evidence, scores, responses, and outcome are sample data for product demonstration. Nothing here is a live claim that a company is licensed, insured, available, verified, or awarded work.
Step 1 · GC intake
Sample role: project manager for a commercial general contractor. Edit the scenario or load a short sample requirement file locally.
Add a local requirement sample
Accepts `.txt`, `.csv`, or `.md`; parsed in the browser only.
Step 3 · Ranked results
Advisory score weights: scope 28%, crew/start 24%, license/insurance evidence 18%, location 12%, project history 10%, reference/review notes 8%.
Scores show sample-fit logic, not qualification, verification, or an award recommendation.
San Jose service area · 8-person recovery crew noted in sample response
Best schedule and local recovery fit in this illustrative list; commercial terms and current certificates still require direct confirmation.
91/100
Amber markers point to evidence that is incomplete, preliminary, or must be checked directly.
All data is illustrative
Scope & TI recovery fit
94 × 28%
Sample project record lists occupied office tenant-improvement work, lighting controls, and after-hours tie-ins.
Start-date & crew coverage
92 × 24%
Sample availability response describes an 8-person crew hold for the requested week; it is not a binding commitment.
License & insurance evidence
82 × 18%
A sample license/insurance record is present, but the certificate issue date and limits must be checked with the contractor and carrier.
Location & logistics
98 × 12%
Vendor profile lists a San Jose service base and local after-hours work history.
Comparable outcomes
89 × 10%
Sample records show two office-floor recoveries; original schedules and owner references are not attached.
Reference / review signal
84 × 8%
Illustrative notes mention responsive closeout communication; the underlying reviewer and date are not verified here.
Santa Clara County service area · 6-person night-shift crew noted in sample profile
Strong controls and panel coordination record with a leaner initial crew; the sample availability evidence does not confirm a second crew.
89/100
East Bay service area · 10-person commercial crew listed in sample profile
The largest sample crew and strong commercial capacity, but commute and an incomplete local-reference trail create recovery-sequencing risk.
83/100
Step 4 · Side-by-side decision view
Choose up to two candidates above. The default comparison shows the illustrative first and second-ranked options.
| Decision criterion | Bayline Electrical Partners 91/100 illustrative score Vendor profile | Coyote Current Electric 89/100 illustrative score Vendor profile |
|---|---|---|
| Recovery strengths |
|
|
| Tradeoffs / operational risk |
|
|
| Best RFQ question | Ask for a recovery schedule, labor loading by shift, overtime assumptions, and a price split for rough-in, controls, and panel coordination. | Ask whether a second crew can be released by the end of week one and require a controls commissioning handoff plan. |
Step 5 · Required Human Checkpoint
A buyer must distinguish records the system can cite from items that need direct confirmation before invitation, selection, or award.
C-10 license status and qualifier
Confirm directlyRequest current CSLB lookup and named qualifier confirmation.
GL and workers’ comp certificates
Confirm directlyObtain current certificate, limits, endorsements, and carrier verification.
October 12 crew commitment
Confirm directlyConfirm foreman, electrician count, shift plan, and backfill plan in writing.
Comparable TI recovery history
Evidence foundSample history is relevant; validate scope, dates, and customer reference.
C-10 license status and qualifier
Confirm directlyVerify current license, classification, and disciplinary status directly.
GL and workers’ comp certificates
Confirm directlyCheck current limits and project-specific endorsements.
Second-crew release
Missing / uncertainNo confirmed date is in the illustrative availability record.
Tenant-improvement reference
Missing / uncertainSample notes do not provide a contact or completed project reference.
Step 6 · Recommended shortlist & RFQ
The recommended illustrative shortlist is Bayline Electrical Partners and Coyote Current Electric. Silverline remains a contingent backup due to travel and uncertainty.
Draft message to selected sample vendors
“We are evaluating an emergency electrical recovery for a downtown San Jose tenant-improvement project. Please confirm your working foreman, available electrician count, October 12 start feasibility, after-hours tie-in plan, current license/insurance documentation, recovery schedule, and itemized commercial assumptions. This is an illustrative RFQ preview only.”
Action is a local demo state; no vendor is contacted.
Step 7 · Sample outcome status
Bayline Electrical Partners
Sample response: proceed to buyer verificationIllustrative response indicates a proposed foreman and recovery schedule; current certificates and labor commitment still require direct validation.
Coyote Current Electric
Sample response: hold as comparison optionIllustrative response supports controls coordination but does not resolve second-crew availability.
Silverline Power Services
Sample response: contingency onlyIllustrative record does not close the travel, release-date, or occupied-building reference gaps.
Illustrative selection rationale
Bayline is the sample lead because its score best combines local recovery fit and a proposed crew hold. This is not an award: a GC would first verify licensing, insurance, labor commitment, price, scope, safety plan, and owner approval.
Map the same review path to your subcontractor data.
Start a trial request to build explainable shortlists and human-verification checkpoints for your own procurement workflow.
A practical matching workflow
01
Define the requirements that matter: capabilities, experience, location, timing, and constraints.
02
See the strongest options first with the individual signals that contributed to every result.
03
Validate the shortlist, capture judgment, and move the right people, vendors, or partners forward.
Team pricing
Each plan begins with a request for a 3-day trial; we confirm fit before access is arranged.
$59USD / month
Basic matching for teams getting started.
Most popular
$149USD / month
For teams that need to compare options and work from source documents.
$399USD / month
For teams that need deeper insight and priority help.
Feedback window
Tell us about the candidates, opportunities, vendors, or workflow you want to compare. We review every note with the product team.
This is a feedback and request-access form, not an automated trial signup. We will only follow up if a conversation is useful.