Built for comparison-heavy teams

AI Matchmaking for Business Opportunities

Turn crowded candidate pools, vendor lists, and project requirements into explainable shortlists your team can confidently act on.

Trial requests are reviewed with your workflow—no account or trial is created from this page.

Interactive match review

From project brief to a defensible shortlist.

Use the walkthrough below to enter a requirement, parse a local sample, inspect weighted score reasoning, compare candidates, and see exactly what a buyer must verify.

01

Requirement

Trade, timing, scope

02

Evidence

Sources and weighted signals

03

Decision

Human verification

Try the illustrated workflow

One system, many queues

Built for the work that follows the first shortlist.

SubConMatch gives your team a common decision surface: what fits, why it fits, and what still needs human verification.

Procurement teams

Match RFPs to qualified vendors

Bring qualification requirements, scope, geography, and capacity into one reviewable vendor shortlist.

Recruiting firms

Match candidates to job requirements

Rank talent against the work that needs doing, then show the evidence behind every recommendation.

Commercial general contractors

Match subcontractors to projects

Compare certifications, trade experience, service area, project size, and availability before outreach.

Government contractors

Match opportunities to capable companies

Surface suppliers for purchasing requirements and business opportunities that fit verified capabilities.

Interactive walkthrough

Emergency electrical recovery in San Jose — from intake to sample RFQ outcome.

Walk through a commercial GC's response after the incumbent electrician falls behind on an occupied tenant-improvement project.

Illustrative scenario only

People, subcontractor names, messages, evidence, scores, responses, and outcome are sample data for product demonstration. Nothing here is a live claim that a company is licensed, insured, available, verified, or awarded work.

  1. 1. Enter requirements
  2. 2. Evaluate sources
  3. 3. Rank & compare
  4. 4. Verify & RFQ
  5. 5. Track sample outcome

Step 1 · GC intake

Morgan Lee enters the recovery need

Sample role: project manager for a commercial general contractor. Edit the scenario or load a short sample requirement file locally.

Add a local requirement sample

Accepts `.txt`, `.csv`, or `.md`; parsed in the browser only.

Step 3 · Ranked results

Illustrative matches for the San Jose recovery request

Advisory score weights: scope 28%, crew/start 24%, license/insurance evidence 18%, location 12%, project history 10%, reference/review notes 8%.

Scores show sample-fit logic, not qualification, verification, or an award recommendation.

1

Bayline Electrical Partners

San Jose service area · 8-person recovery crew noted in sample response

Vendor profilePrior project record

Best schedule and local recovery fit in this illustrative list; commercial terms and current certificates still require direct confirmation.

Closest fit for the October 12 sample startSan Jose service areaCurrent insurance limits and expiration need direct confirmation

91/100

Meaningful score breakdown

Amber markers point to evidence that is incomplete, preliminary, or must be checked directly.

All data is illustrative

Scope & TI recovery fit

94 × 28%

Sample project record lists occupied office tenant-improvement work, lighting controls, and after-hours tie-ins.

Prior project record

Start-date & crew coverage

92 × 24%

Sample availability response describes an 8-person crew hold for the requested week; it is not a binding commitment.

Availability confirmation

License & insurance evidence

82 × 18%

A sample license/insurance record is present, but the certificate issue date and limits must be checked with the contractor and carrier.

License / insurance record

Location & logistics

98 × 12%

Vendor profile lists a San Jose service base and local after-hours work history.

Vendor profile

Comparable outcomes

89 × 10%

Sample records show two office-floor recoveries; original schedules and owner references are not attached.

Prior project record

Reference / review signal

84 × 8%

Illustrative notes mention responsive closeout communication; the underlying reviewer and date are not verified here.

Reference / review notes
2

Coyote Current Electric

Santa Clara County service area · 6-person night-shift crew noted in sample profile

Vendor profilePrior project record

Strong controls and panel coordination record with a leaner initial crew; the sample availability evidence does not confirm a second crew.

Controls and panel coordination fitNearby service areaOnly a 6-person initial crew is indicated

89/100

3

Silverline Power Services

East Bay service area · 10-person commercial crew listed in sample profile

Vendor profilePrior project record

The largest sample crew and strong commercial capacity, but commute and an incomplete local-reference trail create recovery-sequencing risk.

Largest listed sample crewCommercial rough-in and panel capacityEast Bay mobilization complicates night-shift response

83/100

Step 4 · Side-by-side decision view

Compare tangible recovery tradeoffs

Choose up to two candidates above. The default comparison shows the illustrative first and second-ranked options.

Decision criterion

Bayline Electrical Partners

91/100 illustrative score

Vendor profile

Coyote Current Electric

89/100 illustrative score

Vendor profile
Recovery strengths
  • Closest fit for the October 12 sample start
  • San Jose service area
  • Occupied-building and after-hours work appear in sample history
  • Controls and panel coordination fit
  • Nearby service area
  • Potentially cleaner after-hours coordination
Tradeoffs / operational risk
  • Current insurance limits and expiration need direct confirmation
  • Recovery price and overtime assumptions are not supplied
  • Crew hold is preliminary sample evidence
  • Only a 6-person initial crew is indicated
  • Second crew availability is missing
  • Reference contact is absent from sample notes
Best RFQ question

Ask for a recovery schedule, labor loading by shift, overtime assumptions, and a price split for rough-in, controls, and panel coordination.

Ask whether a second crew can be released by the end of week one and require a controls commissioning handoff plan.

Step 5 · Required Human Checkpoint

Do not treat system evidence as approval

A buyer must distinguish records the system can cite from items that need direct confirmation before invitation, selection, or award.

Bayline Electrical Partners

  • C-10 license status and qualifier

    Confirm directly

    Request current CSLB lookup and named qualifier confirmation.

    License / insurance record
  • GL and workers’ comp certificates

    Confirm directly

    Obtain current certificate, limits, endorsements, and carrier verification.

    License / insurance record
  • October 12 crew commitment

    Confirm directly

    Confirm foreman, electrician count, shift plan, and backfill plan in writing.

    Availability confirmation
  • Comparable TI recovery history

    Evidence found

    Sample history is relevant; validate scope, dates, and customer reference.

    Prior project record

Coyote Current Electric

  • C-10 license status and qualifier

    Confirm directly

    Verify current license, classification, and disciplinary status directly.

    License / insurance record
  • GL and workers’ comp certificates

    Confirm directly

    Check current limits and project-specific endorsements.

    License / insurance record
  • Second-crew release

    Missing / uncertain

    No confirmed date is in the illustrative availability record.

    Availability confirmation
  • Tenant-improvement reference

    Missing / uncertain

    Sample notes do not provide a contact or completed project reference.

    Reference / review notes

Step 6 · Recommended shortlist & RFQ

Sample RFQ preview — pending buyer confirmation

The recommended illustrative shortlist is Bayline Electrical Partners and Coyote Current Electric. Silverline remains a contingent backup due to travel and uncertainty.

Draft message to selected sample vendors

“We are evaluating an emergency electrical recovery for a downtown San Jose tenant-improvement project. Please confirm your working foreman, available electrician count, October 12 start feasibility, after-hours tie-in plan, current license/insurance documentation, recovery schedule, and itemized commercial assumptions. This is an illustrative RFQ preview only.”

Action is a local demo state; no vendor is contacted.

Step 7 · Sample outcome status

Responses tracked; rationale remains visible

Bayline Electrical Partners

Sample response: proceed to buyer verification

Illustrative response indicates a proposed foreman and recovery schedule; current certificates and labor commitment still require direct validation.

Coyote Current Electric

Sample response: hold as comparison option

Illustrative response supports controls coordination but does not resolve second-crew availability.

Silverline Power Services

Sample response: contingency only

Illustrative record does not close the travel, release-date, or occupied-building reference gaps.

Illustrative selection rationale

Bayline is the sample lead because its score best combines local recovery fit and a proposed crew hold. This is not an award: a GC would first verify licensing, insurance, labor commitment, price, scope, safety plan, and owner approval.

Map the same review path to your subcontractor data.

Start a trial request to build explainable shortlists and human-verification checkpoints for your own procurement workflow.

Request a 3-day trial

A practical matching workflow

Compare more without losing the reasoning.

  1. 01

    Set the qualification brief

    Define the requirements that matter: capabilities, experience, location, timing, and constraints.

  2. 02

    Review ranked, grounded matches

    See the strongest options first with the individual signals that contributed to every result.

  3. 03

    Make the call with your team

    Validate the shortlist, capture judgment, and move the right people, vendors, or partners forward.

Team pricing

Start with the team and workflow you have today.

Each plan begins with a request for a 3-day trial; we confirm fit before access is arranged.

Most popular

Growth

$149USD / month

For teams that need to compare options and work from source documents.

  • Side-by-side comparison
  • Document upload
Request a 3-day trial

Pro

$399USD / month

For teams that need deeper insight and priority help.

  • Advanced analytics
  • Priority support
Request a 3-day trial

Feedback window

What do you need to match next?

Tell us about the candidates, opportunities, vendors, or workflow you want to compare. We review every note with the product team.

This is a feedback and request-access form, not an automated trial signup. We will only follow up if a conversation is useful.

Press Escape to clear a form message. Your note is sent only when you choose Send feedback.

    SubConMatch | Explainable AI Matching